Hi Wei, > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_frm/thread/351ede73af57d6bb/91124598f8a181bd?&hl=en#91124598f8a181bd. Impressive... In a post regarding bounding of Goppa codes, you have uncovered an unknown attack that the authors of the McEliece-based short signature requested to be made party.
All in a day's work for you! Jeff On 5/26/07, Wei Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NR with recovery is not in Crypto++. It's patented and I think a better > alternative would be a pairing-based short signature scheme. But I'm still > waiting for something even better to be invented. One candidate was a coding > based scheme, but it turned out to be broken. See > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/browse_frm/thread/351ede73af57d6bb/91124598f8a181bd?&hl=en#91124598f8a181bd. > > Rabin-Williams with recovery is available as RWSS<PSSR, SHA512>. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeffrey Walton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Crypto++" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 9:28 AM > Subject: Signature Schemes (with Recovery) > > > > > > Hi Wei, > > > > I want to verify that I have not missed something in the Library. I > > desire to develop metrics using RSA, Rabin, and Nyberg-Rueppel > > Signature Schemes with Recovery. Crtypo++ has RSA. But it appears > > Rabin and Nyberg-Rueppel are not part of the Library. Is this correct? > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
