Thanks man. What compiler are you using there? They showed up under gcc 4.1.2 but its normal for some compilers to be picker than others.
Chris On 5/28/07, Wei Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just incorporated your patch. I haven't seen the compile warnings, but > adding the virtual destructors are a good idea anyway. Thanks for the > reminder. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 6:58 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] - warnings from structs/classes with virtual functions > but non-virtual destructors > > > > > > Any comments on this patch? > > > > Chris > > > > > > On 5/13/07, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Oops. Forgot to attach the patch ;-) > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> On 5/13/07, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Hello Wei, it's been a while ;-) > >> > > >> > A few classes produce compile warnings under gcc 4.1.2 here on > >> > Kubuntu. This patch adds empty virtual destructors to four classes > >> > that produced the warning. Patch is against crypto++ 5.5. > >> > > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
