Basically, if malicious attacks are not a concern (and you can live with
accidental colisions) - MD5 would be fine.----- Original Message -----From:
Jeffrey Walton Date: Friday, June 8, 2007 3:22 pmSubject: Truncated Hash and
Algorithm ChoiceTo: Crypto++ Users > > Hi All,> > The latest NIST
recommendation for hashing is SHA-2. However, when> using a Truncated Hash as
an 'Anonymizing' function, could one > use MD5> instead? Intuition tells me
yes.> > Jeff> > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users"
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
http://www.cryptopp.com.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
