Hi Larrson, On 11/15/07, Larrson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 13 Lis, 15:05, "Jeffrey Walton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Larrson, > > > scheme Nyberg-Rueppel > > > > No. > > Seehttp://groups.google.com/group/cryptopp-users/browse_thread/thread/36.... > > Right, but for what is ValidateNR() in validate suite tests? Whoops - you went to the well once to often ;). Hopefully Wei will be able to answer for you.
> > Anyway, in the archive I have found an earlier version of crypto++ > (4.0) and there is everything what I need. That might indicate a patent issue. I believe Wei has removed classes before for the same reason. Again, he will have to clarify. > It was important for me because in this implementation, verification > of signature can be done without calculate of inversion. [SNIP] Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
