On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> i get these too, and some more when i use a newer g++. most of them > look > reasonable and trivial to fix, so the question is: how big are the > chances a patch that fixes them gets accepted and included? I can't speak for Wei Dai, the official maintainer of Crypto++, but I personally maintain my own variant of Crypto++ for my pycryptopp project, and I would be quite happy to accept your patch. :-) Regards, Zooko --- http://allmydata.org -- Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem http://allmydata.com -- back up all your files for $5/month --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
