On Jan 16, 1:17 pm, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi zooko, > > I should not be suprised, but it kind of caught me off guard that: > > 1) VC++ and gcc were about 17% slower than Intel's compiler > 2) gcc was lagging VC++ > > From the paper: > The experimental results showed that Intel's C++ compiler produces by > far the most optimized code for all ciphers tested. Second and third > place goes to Microsoft Visual C++ 8.0 and gcc 4.1.2, which generate > code which is roughly 16.5% and 17.5% slower than that generated by > Intel's compiler.
I find the same thing on just about any sort of project. Intel C++ v.10 is faster than anything else MS VC++ is 15% slower GCC 4 is a bit slower than MS and GCC 3 is a low slower. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
