On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Wei Dai wrote: > I looked at SHA-256 again, and recalled that the compiler already > does a good job with it, and there's not much I can do to optimize > it further.
Oh, too bad. Thanks for looking! > Well, one possibility is to implement four instances of SHA-256 in > parallel using 128-bit SIMD instructions. But I don't know if any > applications can take advantage of that. Mine can't. Regards, Zooko --- Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem -- http://allmydata.org store your data: $10/month -- http://allmydata.com/?tracking=zsig --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
