Zooko wrote: > For digital signatures, that would be curve25519. Would you be > interested in adding curve25519 into Crypto++?
Yes, I'm actually already doing an implementation of curve25519. It's pretty much done, with only some optimization work left. (See http://groups.google.com/group/crypto-optimization/browse_thread/thread/f971d461a7bbcd4b for details.) However, as far as I know, DJB hasn't defined how it should be used for digital signatures, only for DH. According to http://nacl.cr.yp.to/box.html, digital signatures will be in NACL soon, so presumably a specification of how curve25519 should be used for digital signatures will be coming out as well. If you have specific time constraints, you might want to write to Dan and ask for the details to be released earlier. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
