Sp: INCLUDE_ENCUMBERED On 6/5/09, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Zooko, > > Rather than strip it out, how about a #define: INCLUDE_INCUMBERED or > similar. This way, Crypto++ does not loose features, and folks such as > yourself can choose to gut the encumbered algorithms. > > Jeff > > > On 6/5/09, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Folks: > > > > I'm trying to get pycryptopp and Tahoe-LAFS into Fedora, and one tiny > > little detail that I have to work-around is that MARS is patented. > > Fedora already includes a version of Crypto++ 5.6.0 with mars.cpp > > stripped out, so the only reason I even have to be aware of this > > detail is that I included a copy of Crypto++ v5.6.0 inside the > > pycryptopp source distribution, and now I suppose I need to remove > > mars.cpp from that embedded copy. > > > > Anyway, I was thinking that it might be nice to let Crypto++ be more > > easily/more widely re-used by removing mars.cpp from the Crypto++ > > upstream. I've never heard of anyone using MARS cipher, personally. > > Have you? > > > > Regards, > > > > Zooko > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
