On Jan 9, 4:36 pm, Chris Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brian. > > Yeah, c++ serialization is a pain.
If the only option for C++ serialization were various serialization libraries, I would agree. The C++ Middleware Writer is improving matters. >One reason I'm a huge fan of c#. > > Why not use ssl for an encrypted compressed connection to your server? I'm thinking about that, but my first look at openssl left a bad taste in my mouth. The API seemed a mess. I'm not sure yet about crypto++, but want to explore it more. It is at least written in a much better language than openssl. > Openssl is easy to use and a standard protocol that would save time > from re-inventing the wheel. Can't I get something as good or better with crypto++? Brian Wood http://webEbenezer.net (651) 251-9384
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
