On Nov 30, 8:22 pm, smu johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > Well put. However, I don't think Wei Dai will sue you since we both came to > the same conclusion on the license, Two ComSci guys....
> I also don't think you have to worry about someone other than > Mr. Dai suing you if you break the license agreement, either... To play devils advocate: suppose Wei transfers his rights. > how screwed up the legal system might be, who would pay a lawyer on their > behalf to press charges against a Crypto++ user? Ah! Corporate America has all kinds of neat tricks that anyone can use. Consider DCMA - the act has service providers and hosting services playing digital cops (in return for the equivalent of a dangling carrot - a.k.a. safe harbor). Corporate America got a great ROI when it bribed members of Congress (err, made PAC contributions). Jeff > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, the legislature, lawyers, and judges have the US legal > > system fairly well fucked up. So I understand why these guys want want > > an unambiguous definitions of the terms - its too damn expensive to > > sort the mess. > > > Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
