That would be quite a bit of work for dubious payoff. I prefer to use the static library and let the linker do its job. My crypto++ static library is 18MB. A command line tool that statically links it and doesn't use many of its functions is 1.8MB. I don't think manually paring down the library would buy me much.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it possible to select which algorithms should be built to make the > library smaller? > > For example, i need only algorithms: ECDSA, ECDH, pseudo random number > generators, and password based key derivation functions. > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ > Users" Google Group. > To unsubscribe, send an email to > [email protected]. > More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at > http://www.cryptopp.com. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Crypto++ Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
