Hey everyone, my wiki page's up: http://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/CryptoJPM
@zooko: BLAKE2 will be (fully) included, but Skein will be more versatile (see SKEINROX). @mouse: Sorry but I don't see the attached makefile :-(. Please retry posting it here and if it fails, we'll find a way. Concerning the discussion on the Bernstein functions: I'd be willing include the curves, but I won't make any changes to the logic that processes ECs. So there'd be no advantage as this curve requires modifications of the generic logic implemented in Crypto++. Everyone who already had to do with EC-Crypto knows what I mean. BR JPM Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2015 05:40:27 UTC+1 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Mobile Mouse <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2015, at 23:16 , Jeffrey Walton <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Mobile Mouse <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >>> And I’d be happy enough with the existing implementations. Because > working > >>> with Dan’s code wasn’t all that great in my experience. > >> +1. Anyone who has complained about OpenSSL or Crypto++ has probably > >> not had the pleasure of NaCl. (Is there any documentation yet?) > > > > :-) I’m not aware of any docs worth talking about. > > > > So back to my point: let’s keep Crypto++ as is (plus additional > algorithms of course), without taking anything from NaCl. > > > Yeah, good point. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
