On Jul 1, 2015, at 20:35 , Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > I oppose adding Cmake support. I have it in one of my projects at work, and > > it’s nothing short of nightmare. > > OK, points taken. > > How do you feel about providing it at the Patch page > (http://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Category:Patch)? This way, its available to > those who want it, but it falls into the "provided, unknown quality, and > maybe not maintained" category. (This assumes we will actually get our hands > on a CmakeList.txt :).
My concern is that if it is there - a bonehead is bound to pop up that would create something useful and make it dependent on cmake. Repeating myself - there are enough of useful things that are missing to inundate this project with something of adverse (IMHO) usefulness. For example, how about adding support for Kalina block cipher? https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/650.pdf <https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/650.pdf> -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
