Macports, doing only x64 build (haven't even tried Universal or i386 alone, and 
not planning to).

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:12, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Mobile Mouse <[email protected]> wrote:
>> FWIW, I've had problems with GCC above 4.8.* on Mac OS X - everything builds
>> fine, but the cryptest.exe dies with SEGV. Same with 4.9.*, same with 5.1.
>> So I'm building with clang, which doesn't seem to exhibit such problems.
> 
> OK, so it sounds like I need to do more testing.
> 
> Where did you get you GCC for OS X? MacPorts or Brew? Or did you build
> it yourself? (I'm suspect of GCC on OS X because Apple abandoned it.
> Even when it was being developed, they were not actively supplying
> patches upstream).
> 
> I have not been able to duplicate the SEGV on Debian, Ubuntu, Mint,
> Oracle or Fedora. And I have i386 and x86_64 test systems set up for
> them just for testing compilers.
> 
> I was able to duplicate it on Cygwin. But they don't have a bug
> reporter, so I think there's little hope it will be fixed. I think its
> easier just to keep them at -O2 until they fix their processes.
> 
>> On the thread subject - I think it's OK. Whoever for whatever reasons needs
>> lower optimization level, can accomplish it with vi. :-)
> 
> Its even easier than vi: `make OPTIMIZE = -Ox` will work just fine.
> That's the benefit of using GNU Make or any non-anemic Make (Posix
> Make is pathetically anemic).
> 
> Maybe breaking out the OPTIMIZE and setting it to -O2 is all we need.
> (Though it may not be apparent, this will help with the Crypto++
> engineering process when CI is cut-in)
> 
> Jeff
> 
>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 06:39, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> If there are no objections, I am going to commit this today.
>> 
>>> On Friday, July 3, 2015 at 10:45:40 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> 
>>> And yet another change after more testing... It appears Cygwin's GCC still
>>> has problems in 4.9.
>>> 
>>> ...

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to