Oh look, its Uri. We have the resident expert with us :) On Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 11:51:11 AM UTC-5, Mouse wrote: > > I understand. I've compiled NASM on Mac OS X and it seems to pass all the > tests. > > So while those people are working on porting *binutils* to Mac OS X - > perhaps you could isolate assembly code into separate .s (or .asm) files > that e.g. I could feed to NASM? Because since GNU incorporated GAS into > *binutils*, it became a pain-in-the-neck to deal with. I personally think > that it was a big mistake and a bad move to fold GAS into the *binutils* > package. > > NASM input syntax is said to be "like Intel but with less complexity". > > Thanks! > >
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
