Am 13.09.2015 um 11:09 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > > I've already posted this one in the 6.0 implementation request thread > and pose it here for further discussion. It shows how I've solved the > issue of tweakable block ciphers so far. > > You know, we have a patch page available to stage these things :) See > https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Category:Patch. I'll pair this patch with Threefish and Skein. (-> you don't get and need tweakable block cipher without Threefish), so I'm asking if anyone is objecting the design path I've chosen. > > Functionality like the PEM Pack will likely always be there because > its probably never going to be up-taken by the library. > > Crypto algorithms and crypto systems are a different story because > they are primary goals of Crypto++. I think the tweakable blockcipher class(es) are required for proper integration of Threefish to reflect its unique properties and to allow easy replacement of Threefish within UBI (Skein's mode for using Threefish)
So: Any objections or comments or comments regarding the design of the tweakable block cipher class(es) and its helper classes as documented in the first post of this thread? If not I'll start migrating Threefish and Skein around this design at Sept. 20th (one week from now). From there on redesigns can still take place, but will strongly upset me. BR JPM -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
