Hi Everyone, I stubbed out some code generation tests at http://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/cryptest.sh#L365 and http://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/cryptest.sh#L636. The idea is to disassemble a function and then look for instruction mnemonics. The principal is sound but its failing in practice because of C++ name mangling.
There's kind of a solution at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12400105/getting-mangled-name-from-demangled-name . But in practice, its tough for us to build the mangled names on the fly because it depends on what code path is activated, and it moves around from platform to platform. Are there any suggestions on verifying code generation? Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
