> Initial estimates appear to show its about 6x faster than vanilla C/C++. > Someone like Wei or Andy Polyakov probably would have been closer to 8x > or 9x (I think that's about the theoretical limit), but I'm happy with the > trade-off. >
We are doing better than initial estimates. My lab book tells me from May 2016: GMAC (2K tables) at 12.9 cpb; and GMAC (64K tables) at 12.7 cpb. Throughput was about 90 MB/s on the test device. We are now running at 1.6 cpb for both 2K and 64K tables. That's about 670 MB/s on the same test device. Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
