Am 03.08.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Robert Roessler:

> [snip]
>
> Letting the project files get too far behind what is current will bite
> folks eventually - and for exactly what perceived "benefit"?
>
> But this doesn't seem to worry anyone here...
I'm actively monitoring the developments surrounding further Visual
Studio development, I also do have all version starting from 2010, so as
soon as something breaks on a new release, we _will_ notice it and we'll
fix it within the current solution file or - if not possible - we will
provide a new solution file ("hidden" in a .zip file) which will be a
extract-once solution for the problem, as we have done before we had the
current default VS2010 project files (and as we do have right now for
VS2005 and VS2008).
>  
>
>     [snip]
>
>
> Modulo everyone understanding that use in a for-profit project could
> of course require a paid upgrade to a "Pro" version, it *is* free - 1)
> ANY MS account works, even if just something you signed up years ago
> for say, an old MSDN subscription, and 2) you only need to "log in" to
> VS 2015 once to "activate" the Community Edition, you don't need to do
> it again.
>
> I can certainly understand users from the non-Windows world not having
> any MS "account" they can use for this purpose, but anyone who has
> developed for Windows for more than the last 6 months NOT having one? 
> Really? :)
Not everybody does Windows Store development or hardware driver
development, which are about the only two use cases where you _need_ a
Microsoft account AFAICT.
>
> I am not interested in arguing these points, just trying to make sure
> other folks are not talked out of using a very nice free tool by
> thinking there are "barriers" when there really may not be any at all.
>
> Again, *I* am not the one who is doing the maintenance work on
> Crypto++, and if the people who *are* generously donating their time
> and talents choose for themselves to not update the project, or not
> use current tooling that is free in the majority of cases, that is
> their call - but it might be a bit more fair to ensure that more than
> one side of the argument is heard.
As for this point: Trust me, we already had the discussions about VS2015
here on-list. What we have right now _does_ work and satisfies all
parties for now. If the situation changes we will re-evaluate our position.
(If you really want to know the details, there's always the search
function in the google group)

BR

JPM

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to