Am 03.08.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Robert Roessler: > [snip] > > Letting the project files get too far behind what is current will bite > folks eventually - and for exactly what perceived "benefit"? > > But this doesn't seem to worry anyone here... I'm actively monitoring the developments surrounding further Visual Studio development, I also do have all version starting from 2010, so as soon as something breaks on a new release, we _will_ notice it and we'll fix it within the current solution file or - if not possible - we will provide a new solution file ("hidden" in a .zip file) which will be a extract-once solution for the problem, as we have done before we had the current default VS2010 project files (and as we do have right now for VS2005 and VS2008). > > > [snip] > > > Modulo everyone understanding that use in a for-profit project could > of course require a paid upgrade to a "Pro" version, it *is* free - 1) > ANY MS account works, even if just something you signed up years ago > for say, an old MSDN subscription, and 2) you only need to "log in" to > VS 2015 once to "activate" the Community Edition, you don't need to do > it again. > > I can certainly understand users from the non-Windows world not having > any MS "account" they can use for this purpose, but anyone who has > developed for Windows for more than the last 6 months NOT having one? > Really? :) Not everybody does Windows Store development or hardware driver development, which are about the only two use cases where you _need_ a Microsoft account AFAICT. > > I am not interested in arguing these points, just trying to make sure > other folks are not talked out of using a very nice free tool by > thinking there are "barriers" when there really may not be any at all. > > Again, *I* am not the one who is doing the maintenance work on > Crypto++, and if the people who *are* generously donating their time > and talents choose for themselves to not update the project, or not > use current tooling that is free in the majority of cases, that is > their call - but it might be a bit more fair to ensure that more than > one side of the argument is heard. As for this point: Trust me, we already had the discussions about VS2015 here on-list. What we have right now _does_ work and satisfies all parties for now. If the situation changes we will re-evaluate our position. (If you really want to know the details, there's always the search function in the google group)
BR JPM -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.