> This was a good week. We got a number of patches from the community and > four different submitters introduced breaks. I needed to refine at least > three patches. I think its a good time to share my philosophy, and open it > up for debate. >
I need to add an addendum... Make that "I needed to refine at least four patches". The last one was the 302 bug, and users experienced it in the field. Since users caught it, that make it particularly egregious. So I think I have the other submitters beat wen it comes to "badness" on the break scale. Keep moving forward, keep you patches coming. Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
