> So I suggest a change as follow:
> #if defined(__MINGW32__)
> // avoid ambiguity if we have two versions of memcpy_s
> #if !defined(MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API) || (MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API + 0 == 0) || 
> defined(CRYPTOPP_WANT_SECURE_LIB)
>         using CryptoPP::memcpy_s;
> #else
>         using ::memcpy_s;
> #endif
> #endif
>

Oh, that's uglier than normal.

Are there any objections to the change outlined by trungantran?

trungantran, do you feel like making a pull request?

Jeff 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to