> So I suggest a change as follow:
> #if defined(__MINGW32__)
> // avoid ambiguity if we have two versions of memcpy_s
> #if !defined(MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API) || (MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API + 0 == 0) ||
> using CryptoPP::memcpy_s;
> using ::memcpy_s;
Oh, that's uglier than normal.
Are there any objections to the change outlined by trungantran?
trungantran, do you feel like making a pull request?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users"
To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-users-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.