On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 2:14:23 AM UTC+2, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:28 AM Olli Savolainen > <olli.sa...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > Oh thanks, that actually seems to work. I had just forgotten the using > directive so it seemed like SHA256 enum value didn't seem to work. > > Just curious, why is SHA3 different, or have I just messed up somehow? > > It is probably you, but we can't seem to get you to provide your code > so we are left to speculate and guess. > > Works for me... > > Thanks.
Oh, I was just using SHA3 as enum value, not SHA3_256. My first message had a mistake with the url, which I corrected in the second message of the thread. I meant this page, which has an SHA1 example. I guess it would be fruitful to replace it with a example that uses a hash that's reliable. https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Digital_signature Olli -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com and http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cryptopp-users. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
