On 25.11.2011 13:44, Jorrit Tyberghein wrote: > Well I'm not married to SourceForge. At this moment we're not doing much > more on SF > then the subversion server and the mailing lists. We can even keep the > project there for the > mailing lists if needed.
True. Mailing lists and file hosting would probably be the “leftover” services that are still useful for us. Note that one of the beauties of git is that it doesn't have a single “central” repository. That is, we could start off with git on SF (e.g. we could check if they offer a “conversion” from svn to git) and later switch the “official” main repository to github (but use SF as a mirror or so). On 25.11.2011 08:53, Denis Washington wrote: > What about bug tracking? Trac is specialized on working with Subversion. > There seems to be a Git plugin, but as it is not part of the core > distribution, it is unclear how well that works. Very good point. IMO we should have a good idea on how we handle bug + issue tracking before moving to git. If an alternative bug tracking software is considered, it's also noteworthy is that the existing trac is not only filled with bugs and issues (which would have to converted) but also serves as a Wiki for developers to share/sketch out ideas; an alternative would have to be found for that as well. -f.r.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
