Volkan YAZICI wrote: >Evet, bundan Practical Common Lisp'te de bahsediliyor. Daha çok merak >ettiğim, neden böyle bir ayrıma gidildiği. (Bu Lisp için de böyle >miydi, yoksa Common Lisp ile birlikte gelen bir ayrıntı mı?) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp#Comparison_with_other_Lisps
Common Lisp is sometimes termed a /Lisp-2/ and Scheme a /Lisp-1/, referring to CL's use of separate namespaces for functions and variables. (In fact, CL has /many/ namespaces, such as those for go tags, block names, and |loop| keywords.) There is a long-standing controversy between CL and Scheme advocates over the tradeoffs involved in multiple namespaces. In Scheme, it is (broadly) necessary to avoid giving variables names which clash with functions; Scheme functions frequently have arguments named |lis|, |lst|, or |lyst| so as not to conflict with the system function |list|. However, in CL it is necessary to explicitly refer to the function namespace when passing a function as an argument -- which is also a common occurrence, as in the |sort| example above. arnesi kullanarak lisp-1 sexpleri lisp-2 icinde kullanmak mumkun. saglicakla, evrim. _______________________________________________ cs-lisp mailing list [email protected] http://church.cs.bilgi.edu.tr/lcg http://cs.bilgi.edu.tr/mailman/listinfo/cs-lisp
