csc...@dima.secretsauce.net writes: > Dima Kogan <csc...@dima.secretsauce.net> writes: > > I tested several flavors of emacs. Xemacs 21 and GNU emacs 23+ appear to > work. It doesn't make sense to support anything older, I don't think. > Does that sound reasonable?
Gentlemen: The copy of xcscope.el that lives here appears to be stable, so I started a new project with JUST xcscope.el: https://github.com/dkogan/xcscope.el I don't consider this a fork, since the in-tree code doesn't really change. The main changes are listed at that page. This new code is now distributed in MELPA and in Ubuntu and in Debian. As I said before, this tree fixes bugs and adds features, but tries not to break anything or change any functionality that existing users may rely on. I ask that at the very least a note be added to the in-tree xcscope.el to point users to the new tree. If yall agree to do this, I'll reply with the bug tracker and patch tracker entries that have now been handled. Thanks dima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Cscope-devel mailing list Cscope-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cscope-devel
