----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, 11 July 2003 13:46
Subject: Re: [csforum] more patent
info
After searching the New Zealand Patent office (Now know as the
Intellectual Property Database) to find the New Zealand Patent pertaining to
DE Technologies (DET)
http://www.iponz.govt.nz/search/cad/dbssiten.main
( International Application Number PCT/US98/26220) I find that due to this
Patent being issued, the New Zealand patent office May be liable to
buy a licence.
As they have a database driven service offering both documents, and
invoices to international companies, this is evident as they have the ability
to receive and supply document to International parties who wish to secure a
patent in New Zealand using international transaction services.
Does this mean that OUR hard ear'nt tax dollars that pay for all
government services will be indirectly paying for a licence to comply with the
patent THEY ISSUED!
Food for thought
Yours in success,
Gary Rimell
Director of Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 03 328
7203
Fax: 03 328 8204
Mobile: 021 138 5809
ICQ 21631223
![]()
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, 11 July 2003 11:21
Subject: [csforum] more patent
info
FYI, more coverage on the patent fight in the Herald
at:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3511840
(Anyone
seen if the Press has picked this up?)
The story says that "the
Ministry of Economic Development said the only
action that could be taken
was by those questioning the patent's validity.
"This is a commercial
matter. If people wish to dispute the validity of
the patent there are
mechanisms in the Patents Act (1953) for them to seek
to have the patent
revoked."
The most common grounds for a patent being revoked are
where it can be
shown that the invention is not new or that "the
invention claimed is an
obvious progression of what has gone
before".
So the patent was granted in New Zealand in June 2002 --
anyone else got
any examples of use before then? Or, following on from
Fraser's posting,
ideally from 1997? Is it really distinctly different to
undertaking the
same process with a person on the end of a phone line? Or
a fax form?
Sounds like it's going to cost a lot to find out -- the
Herald story notes
that attempting to have a patent declared invalid
could cost up to
$150,000!
More info here:
http://www.fightthepatent.co.nz/
Cheers,
Vicki
======================================================
SPIS
Ltd, Box 19-760, Christchurch, NZ http://.spis.co.nz
* FREE TurboNote+ sticky
note trial: http://TurboNote.com
--> via
Canterbury Software email forum: Success through Connections
Email your
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searchable
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave
or rejoin the list: http://canterburysoftware.org.nz/forum.htm
