Using hashlimit will certainly cause UDP packets to be erroneously dropped.
UDP is stateless, however iptables counters this with the hashlimit module
to create a hash based on the header of the packet to try and match it to a
'connection' or a sequence of UDP packets. srcds is UDP based, 130/s will
probably cause packets to be dropped.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Левинчук Федор <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I`m reading iptables man
>
> *hashlimit*
>
> it`s limit like -limit key but create different query for each host
> for SRCDS it will limit packages for one connection?
>
> for ex in
>
> net_channels
> - remote IP: 79.105.25.42:27005
> - online: 14:00
> - reliable: available
> - latency: 0.1, loss 0.00
> - packets: in 62.8/s, out 64.5/s
> - choke: in 0.52, out 0.00
> - flow: in 9.5, out 22.4 kB/s
> - total: in 7.7, out 19.8 MB
>
> NetChannel 'psch':
> - remote IP: 94.245.190.164:27005
> - online: 07:16
> - reliable: available
> - latency: 0.1, loss 0.00
> - packets: in 128.6/s, out 130.0/s
> - choke: in 0.00, out 0.00
> - flow: in 20.6, out 43.5 kB/s
> - total: in 8.2, out 19.4 MB
> my servers has 128 tiks
>
> and if I make
>
>
> IPTABLES -A INPUT -p udp --dport 27015:27540 -m state --state NEW -m
> hashlimit --hashlimit-mode srcip --hashlimit-upto 130/s -j ACCEPT
> IPTABLES -A INPUT -p udp --dport 27015:27540 -j DROP
>
> it will pass normal players connect and drop if more then 130 packages in
> secoond for each? or i mistaking?
>
> 06.10.2015, 09:34, "Calvin J" <[email protected]>:
>
> :\
>
> sv_max_queries_sec 15
>
> On 10/5/2015 7:26 PM, Левинчук Федор wrote:
>
> ok thx, i`ll bring it to default
> description of this cvar is not clear
> I tested with sv_max_queries_sec "2.0" at console saw lines of limitations
> for my HLSW queries, thought it some kind of protection, and if cvar lower
> is better
>
> Now i thinking maybe there are commands that increase IO operations? like
> it was with "sound_test" ?
>
>
> --
> Calvin Judy
> Founder & CEO
> PH#: (843) 410-8486
> Mail: [email protected]
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to