Valve has been very vague about what actually they consider wrong.  I was
originally led to believe it was messing with Valve's inventory system via
purposeful manipulation.  But obviously our servers got banned without
modifying player inventory.

All our requests for information from Valve about what exactly it was they
found wrong have gone unanswered.  Valve Support only gives canned
responses similar to VAC canned responses.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Dennis @ Prima Servers <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Read this:
> http://csgo-servers.1073505.n5.nabble.com/A-question-about-custom-models-tp11321p11328.html
>
> På 02-02-2016 00:31:10, Unbelievable <[email protected]> skrev:
> Does anyone have actual evidence that valve had approved custom weapon
> modes
> and player models because as usual valve has no comment all they do is
> strike-through rules and expect people to know what it means without
> explanation.
>
> I was apart of a Petition that apparently won which could be true or not I
> want to hear it from valve them selfs.
>
>
> https://www.change.org/p/valve-corporation-hidden-path-entertainment-ido-magal-matt-wood-dont-ban-csgo-servers-for-custom-models-like-rpg-crossbow-etc/u/15213382?tk=7sCdm0RIdlBpoE1H987i9jLiTztezyklS_9KeNpdoQ8&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://csgo-servers.1073505.n5.nabble.com/Anyone-confirm-that-custom-weapon-models-player-models-allowed-tp11378.html
> Sent from the CSGO_Servers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to