if it's an IE (only) hack, should it be escaped for IE (only)?
On 6/3/05, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lea Anna Davis schrieb: > > Adding the code #menu a:hover {background:1%;} worked! How bizarre. I > > have no idea why IE needs to have this code. > > background:1%; tries to position a background-image (no matter if there > is one or not) and reminds IE to do something: redraw all possible > affected elements. > Any background change on hover does this trick. This 1% has no sense at > all. It's short, does not harm (mostly) the layout, and everybody knows > instantly that this must be a hack, that's all. > > Ingo > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/