> Ingo Chao wrote: > >With your "Holly hack", you force the li to gain layout. But layout li get > >their own counting context ("having layout means that an element is > >responsible for drawing its own content"). So, every li counts for itself > >(1. 1. 1. 1.)
Paul Novitski wrote: > I'm interested in learning more about the IE 'has layout' phenomenon as it > pertains to lists. Can you point me to any resources that address that > issue specifically? I've found material on Microsoft's hasLayout property > but nothing really on its effect on lists. Holly and I wrote two articles on just this subject for CMX (but alas we didn't know about the 1's bug, darn it!), and the first is here: http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?cid=01DB3 The 2nd part covers the actual layout stuff and has a mini-tut on the layout subject, but it's a subscriptin site. You can go to the main page and there's a link to a 10 day free trial so you will be able to read it. The only requirement is that you have to show the ability to pay via plastic before getting the free trial. That 2nd part was published only yesterday! Big John -- Perennial student + Impractical joker + CSS junkie = Big John <http://www.positioniseverything.net> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/