So, I tried many things to come to a solution, but it seems it won't
work. I don't have padding or width declarations for the #content id,
yet it's not showing as it should in IE.
I need some more advice, if someone could give it.
Thanks in advance!
On 6/26/05, Radu Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you very much for advice. This is just a sketch of what it will
> be... I'll change colors for visited links and font sizes (I think
> I'll use ems) ... my problem is positioning in IE. I dont' know what
> the problem is right now ... that's why I asked here.
>
> On 6/26/05, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Radu Adam wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the advice and tips. Can you take a new look at it? It
> > > looks much better now... only that IE doesn't show it as it should.
> > > Some more help needed, please.
> >
> > Looking only in FF 1.0.4, I don't see too many problems. Mostly it's
> > nice.
> >
> > 1: a.com {
> > font-size: 11px;
> > font-weight: normal;
> > text-decoration: none;
> > color: #B30E0B;
> > }
> >
> > a:hover.com {
> > font-size: 11px;
> > font-weight: normal;
> > text-decoration: underline;
> > color: #B30E0B;
> > }
> >
> > can be condensed to:
> > a.com {
> > font-size: 11px;
> > font-weight: normal;
> > text-decoration: none;
> > color: #B30E0B;
> > }
> >
> > a:hover.com {
> > text-decoration: underline;
> > }
> >
> > A bigger problem is that your link colors above do not distinguish
> > between visited and unvisited links. That's bad:
> > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html
> >
> > 2: body {font-size: 70%;} makes no distinction based upon the visitor's
> > browser setting. He could have set his to 12px because he has good eyes
> > and a large display, or to 28px because he has weak eyes but a typical
> > display, or left it alone because he found the shipped default perfectly
> > suitable. Yet in spite of any of these desires or needs, you've decided
> > he is wrong, and imposed text 49% the actual size of what he wants or
> > needs: http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/area70.html A typical IE user
> > may necessarily have already set his to larger or largest, in which case
> > he cannot make it big enough to overcome your 70% rule. BTW, your 11px
> > a.com link styles above to a user with 20px or more default will be
> > functionally invisible in the absence of zoom capability.
> >
> > 3: A fixed width that requires 1024x768 resolution and a maximized
> > browser to avoid horizontal scroll will make many unhappy. With
> > 1024x768, IE maximized cannot be made wide enough to have no scroll.
> >
> > 4: Don't ask for an opinion about a page without supplying its complete
> > location. Many email programs do not make clickable links in the absence
> > of a stanadard URL prefix like https:// or ftp://. If you want help,
> > don't make helping hard to do: http://www.dinamo-online.net/beta/
> > --
> > "Love does not demand its own way." 1 Corinthians 13:5
> >
> > Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
> >
> > Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
> >
>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
