> When I use the shorthand
> background: url(image.gif) fixed;
>
> all browsers should expand it to
> background: url(image.gif) 0% 0% fixed transparent;
>
>
> In Mr. Zeldman's book (Designing with ...) I've seen an explicit
>
> p {
> background: transparent;
> ...
> ...
> }
>
> and I don't understand, why it could/should be important,
> since this is the initial value anyway, and there is no
> earlier declaration to overwrite. Prevention?
My guess it is a best practice thing: When you define a foreground,
you should also define a background. The CSS validator also moans
about omitting that.
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
