On 7/20/05, Philip Wills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a bit confused by your discussions of impressions on clicks. > Sometimes ads are sold by page impression, sometimes by clickthrough > to third-party's site. >
Sorry for the confusion. The factor that I am talking about is the clickthru's themselves, specifically, the number of clickthru's we are counting on our ad server versus the number of clickthru's the 3rd party server is saying actually occurred. > I can see how the latter could potentially be causing some > undercounting if the css meant that for some users' browsers the ads > were positioned off screen, but I can't see how the former could > possibly be effected. > > Looking at your sight your side-ad is off-screen for my default > browser size on both anyway, so I'm flummoxed as to how this could be > css related.. Well, we don't know either, but this is the only change that has occurred which is why the effort here is to disqualify CSS as the problem before persuing the ad agency with the issue. (It's to their advantage for their software to undercount the number of clickthru's, so they are not very helpful at all when it comes to an undercount situation.) Thanks! -- Yazmin ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
