David, Fixed. Fully validating CSS and XHTML1.1 now. :-)
Thanks, Tatham Oddie Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea www.fueladvance.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2005 1:18 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org; Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) Subject: Re: [css-d] IE6 Rendering Wierdness Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) wrote: >David, > > > >>Why do you have 1em font-size on the html and 75% font-size on the body >>(em is doing a minor number on it at text-size largest in IE)? >> >> > >This is just my standard CSS starter... I can't remember why I did it, just >that it seems to work nicer.. > > > >>When you get around to it there are a couple of easily fixable css >>errors to be corrected. >> >> > >These are errors on purpose for IE6 - using _propname to give IE specific >rules. Any suggestions on how I might satisfy the validator and not break >the design? > > > >Thanks, > >Tatham Oddie >Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea >www.fueladvance.com > > > > Tatham, Feed the underscore hacks to IE via conditional comments so that they are hidden from the validatoror; or, use Star html instead-- * html #foo {...} Different strokes, for different folks-- I guess. Regards, David Laakso ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
