Al Lemieux wrote:

I'm in total agreement with Haoshiro. Hacks are just that - hacks. Its like
using a screwdriver to hammer in a nail. A lot of them didn't work for me
either.

May I suggest that this topic is covered sufficiently on the Wiki? Please see these pages:

<http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ToHackOrNotToHack> - discusses this exact topic of whether or not to hack at all <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssHack> - links to detailed discussions of many hacks and their possible shortcomings <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CategoryBrowserBug> - links to various bug resource sites <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=GoodCSSHack> - attempts to define whether or not a CSS hack is "good" <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=AvoidingHacks> - suggests workaround methods that avoid true hacks

Not to pick on Al at all. It's just that this topic has been known to reach Holy War status. I'd rather not see that on the list. Very messy.

Thanks,

--

-Adam Kuehn
CSS-D List Moderator
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to