Please comment on
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jkatz/baisabe.d/kitchen.html
and
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jkatz/baisabe.d/tefillah.html
with css at
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jkatz/baisabe.d/tefillah.css
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jkatz/baisabe.d/kitchen.css
and
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~jkatz/baisabe.d/baisabe.css
Both pages are sized entirely with ems, with only the font
size specified in pixels. Are there any downsides to this
approach?
Thanks!
Lilly
Lilly:
I use em's all the time, it's my favorite choice of measurement.
Plus, it works (i.e., keeps same relative position) for all zoom
levels if you tie your images to them.
However, for consistency, I would suggest that you use .875 em
instead of 14 px in your font size. To convert from pixels to em's,
just divide by 16. Check out:
http://www.webbytedd.com/examples/text-zoom/
HTH's.
tedd
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
