Alex Robinson wrote:
What would be most useful is if someone with access to a Windows box and a bunch of Gecko-derived browsers could work on a simplified test case that shows what combination of nestedness, overflow: hiddens etc cause things to happen. Does the negative margins cause the problem?

Small testcase:

http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/fxselectbug.html

Confirmed with Firefox 1.0.5 [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.9) Gecko/20050711]

Not scrolling/bug fixed in Firefox 1.5beta2 [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20051006]

Suggestion for a fix: remove the position: relative in .wrapper h2

Seems to fix it in your test file too here (http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/example/rounded).

regards
Ingo
----------

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title>bug</title>


<style type="text/css">
/* code snippet without sense, just to reproduce the upscrolling drag-select bug */

#block_1
        {
        float: left;
        width: 150px;
        }

#block_1
        {
        padding-bottom: 32767px;
        margin-bottom: -32767px;
        }

.wrapper
        {
        overflow: hidden;
        }

.wrapper h2
        {
        position: relative; /* remove to fix  */
        }
        
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div class="wrapper">
        <div id="block_1">
                <h2>Drag-select Block 1</h2>
                <p>filler</p>
        </div>
</div>
</body>
</html>


--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to