On 11/29/05, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Hamm wrote:
>
> >I've been asking around in webdesign mailing list for feedbacks and
> >learned a lot about em, % and accessibility in CSS part.  I'm trying
> >to use % so I can add up to 100% and I've been told that em is better
> >than % because of IE goof-ups.  I've read in various CSS articles and
> >they had their own preferences.  If em is the best method to set up
> >CSS, then how can I add up the width to remain fluid like %? Your
> >feedback will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
>
> As Bob pointed out, this list is not for discussing whether or not
> people resize their text, etc.  So let's not discuss that any further.
> But Scott has asked some good questions about em and percentages in
> general that I'd like to address, without getting into which is "better."
>
> I think the most important thing to remember when using ems or
> percentages is that they are not interchangeable when used as a unit of
> measurement for width.  They are interchangeable when used as a unit of
> measurement for font-size, so this point can be confusing, but is very
> important.
>
> A layout with widths set in ems has a size based on the font size of the
> user. So, one user with a larger default font size may see your layout
> at 1000px, while another user with a smaller font size will see your
> layout at 800px.  This also means that the layout will change in size if
> the user manually resizes his or her textm, but things will stay roughly
> in proportion to one another.
>
> A layout with widths set in percentages has a size based on the viewport
> size of the user.  The layout will change in size if the user manually
> changes the size of his or her browser window.
>
> So it's up to you whether you want the layout to be dependent on font
> size or window size.  Or neither (fixed width via pixels).  I don't know
> of any percentage-based IE bugs that can be avoided by switching to ems
> (can you give us the source of this information?), and anyway, an em
> layout is not the same as a percentage layout, so don't use IE bugs as
> your deciding factor of which to use.
>
> Zoe
>
> --
> Zoe M. Gillenwater
> Design Services Manager
> UNC Highway Safety Research Center
> http://www.hsrc.unc.edu
>
>

My source would be http://www.deafaviator.org/fbcom/index.php (IE part
will be fixed -- I'm tired of working up on hacks after each little
change).  My objective here is to leave right side on the end of
browser without going over or under.

______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>


--
Power to people, Linux is here.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to