Thank you very much for your quick response. It worked. Now I have to go
back through every CSS site I have ever done and make this correction. ;)
Thanks again.
Bart
On 1/9/06 12:11 PM, "Matthew Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Bart Hook wrote:
>
>> The states of my links seem to be getting "confused". They all end up
>> looking like the footer links. Any idea why this may be happening?
>> Any help
>> is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Here is the CSS:
>>
>> .footer a:link, a:visited {
>> color: #ffffff;
>> text-decoration: none;
>> }
>>
>> .footer a:hover, a:active {
>> color: #ffffff;
>> text-decoration: underline;
>> }
>
> Bart,
>
> The problem is with the last two declarations. After the comma, it's
> an entirely new selector -- the a:visited selector doesn't know that
> it's supposed to come under the .footer. Same with a:active. A
> visited link will always look like what you intend to be a footer
> visited link.
>
> Here's how the declarations should read:
>
> .footer a:link, .footer a:visited {
> color: #ffffff;
> text-decoration: none;
> }
>
> .footer a:hover, .footer a:active {
> color: #ffffff;
> text-decoration: underline;
> }
>
> That should do the trick.
>
> Good luck!
-------------------------
Bart Hook
Lead Designer
The Archer Group
www.archer-group.com
p: 302.429.9121*207
f: 302.429.8720
The Simplicity of Success
-------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
