Martin said: > IMHO "one true layout" is the best choice this time, but it uses > a very ugly, not futureproof "hack" (CSS3 media query) to get > things working in Opera. I wouldn't use it for a production > site. But for your aims it is probably the best choice.
Zoe said: > I'm hesistant to say that One True Layout is the best thing out > there, but it's probably the best thing on our wiki for your > purposes. Test heavily though. I wasn't expecting the recommendations to be so scary! :O) > Another option would be to have different HTML sources for each > of the layout choices your users have. This would require less > hackery to get working cross-browser than One True Layout. In Zeldman's 2003 book, he talks about using hybrid layouts -- tables for the grid, CSS for everything else. 2.5+ years later, am I still better off doing that, compatibility-wise? (I'd hoped to avoid a hybrid layout so that savvy users could make dramatic changes by just editing the CSS.) It's important to me to try to make the right decisions early on, since this theme will be eventually be used by tens of thousands of people. -- Charles Zoe: I appreciate the "do not reply" note. This hasn't been an issue on other lists, and Outlook threads properly (maybe Thunderbird 1.5 does too?), so I'd have never known about it! ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
