Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:

>>[...]
>>http://www.charlestonwebsolutions.com/test_case/block_nav_01.html
>>
>>[...]did not test this in anything but Firefox on my Mac.  
>>Should be OK for other browsers, even IE, but check all the 
>>browsers you are concerned about to be sure.
>>    
>>
>I can confirm that this works on IE6. :-)
>
Hi all,
Affirmative too for the Mozilla-family under Win98SE: Mozilla 1.7, 
Firefox1.07, Netscape6.  :-)
Also: Opera7.45 and Opera8.01.  :-)
Because this is a widely used and proved concept, and html- and 
css-validator are allright, I don't expect WinXP and/or newer browser 
versions of the above will  give any problem.

francky

Tip 1:
For future compatibility-safety you can change the * html IE-hack in a 
Conditional Comment: <!--[if IE]> and so on. Then if IE7 would go 
another way, you can differentiate and give additional IE-guidelines if 
needed: <!--[if lte IE 7]>.

Tip 2:
For accessibility-safety you can have a look at the css-validator 
warnings about some refinements in the color/background-color pairs.

Tip 3:
The html-valid image is borrowed from the w3c-site. While w3c can be 
pretty busy every now and then, this can slower the download.

Tip 4:
Combining images can also speed up the download. See testpage over here 
<http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/test-ih-footer.htm>.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to