On 3/4/06, Mark Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if you are doing an application that requires Javascript, why > > not do everything with Javascript? Especially when your company > > doesn't hire anyone who knows anything about CSS. > > > > To prove my point, you can always switch to "Basic HTML" by clicking > > the link at the bottom of the screen. If you view the inbox in Basic > > HTML, it's just a table. > > I won't push this as I'm no evangelist, but.... the entries in the > inbox are perfectly valid content for a table; it is a listing of > data, after all.
There's nothing to push. The topic has nothing to do with the validity of the markup, we are discussing whether Gmail's implementation is JS or CSS. Please try and get on topic. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
