Scott Wilcox wrote: > I was writing to you guys to see what pointers you have, and would > suggest when it comes down to accessibility, usability, cross > compatibility and general aesthetics too. I'm unsure of going to for > a more web 2.0 look due to the fact its becoming increasingly > overused. I'd still like to stay unique to a certain extent.
On "accessibility" (and all the rest) I'd advice you to keep an eye on this article-series... <http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/evaluating_website_accessibility_part_1_background_and_preparation/> ...as it develops. Some good starting-points are there already. > I'm thinking of going for a three column, fluid width layout with > three columns, left, content and centre (left and right being > ~180-200px). Anyone's comments, ideas and links welcome :) Pick and choose... <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ThreeColumnLayouts> I still prefer to build two and three (and whatever) column layouts based on this... <http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins/> ...but maybe that's just me ;-) regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
