David Dorward wrote:
> CSS 2 is the most recent (finished) version of CSS.
>
> 2.1 is currently a working draft.
>
> 3 is currently a large collection of different modules at different
> stanges in development, but only four seem to have reached Candidate
> Recomendation status (which I believe means "We think it is ready,
> but we need a couple of browsers to support it and test it before we
> finalise it").
>
> So currently it makes sense for CSS 2 to be the default profile.
Not so sure about that, as "support by browsers" is no good if designers
are thrown off by being told "it isn't valid". Not that I see a big
problem in the way it is handled now, but such "not yet standard" should
have been handled a little more designer-friendly - by adding an
informative message to the 'error', or something. Wouldn't have to use
css-d to inform people about how the validator works then.
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
