Jeniffer C. Johnson wrote: > Thanks for this little piece of info at the very least. I was > seriously starting to think I'd lost what little mind I have left. I > am on Opera 8.54.
I've already lost all I ever had. No big deal, IMO :-) > I was stumped, and resorted back to validation checks. CSS still > validated, but in rechecking the html I discovered that a > search/replace a few days ago replaced <html > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> with <html > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2299/xhtml";>. And apparently 2299 isn't a > valid directory. ;-) Not yet, anyway :-) If there's still a web by then, then I expect the standards for it to look a bit more 'advanced' then what we've got now ;-) > What's interesting to me is that only Opera stumbled over this. All > the other browsers appeared to completely ignore this invalid value. > What's even more interesting is that only /some/ versions of Opera seem to catch that 1000 years leap. It is a fact that browsers don't really use all the information provided by us, but instead tend to just pass it by without further notice - especially when pages are served as 'text/html' and enters the "wonderful" world of error-recovery. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
