Dave Pierce wrote: > http://www.lorettosedgwick/org/pages/index2.html
Corrected address, I think: <http://www.lorettosedgwick.org/pages/index2.html> (couldn't find anything on the address you gave) A number of flaws according to the html-validator... <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lorettosedgwick.org%2Fpages%2Findex2.html> ...some of which make CSS validation and further checking and troubleshooting close to impossible. That page is relying on error-recovery in all browsers at the moment, so not much use in browser-checking just yet. Flawless markup _is_ a must for well-working CSS. A glance at the source-code tells me that the strategy seems better in the latest version though, so you only have to clean up and make proper xhtml out of it. Preferably 'xhtml 1.0 Strict', or 'html 4.01 Strict' if you prefer - and don't forget the 'html' element. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
