Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > >> You've learned the wrong lesson, I think :-)
> Not surprising as this is far from how I make my living. Me neither :-) ...and I usually only deal with the practical/visual side of image-formats. Image-formats are usually not a proper subject for discussion on css-d. After all: it isn't a CSS related problem. So, to avoid sending a lot of [off-topic] information to all list-members: look at these resources for information about png formats and options... <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNG> <http://www.w3.org/Graphics/PNG/> ...and have a search for 'png', 'gif' and 'jpg' for more. Also, you may find suitable places to discuss image-formats by checking links in the [off-topic] page: <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=OffTopic> >> A jpg has no transparency, so it will cover up the background just >> like before. > > > I find this unclear: by covering the background, do you mean that the > jpg will display as a filled rectangle on IE rather than as an > ellipse? A jpg will display as a filled rectangle in all browsers. Contact me [off-list] if you want to discuss more surrounding the practical sides of images on the web. regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
