At 00:06 +0100 28/7/06, Dave Goodchild wrote: >Has anyone ever noticed that the Google home page and gmail.com use tables >for layout, deprecated elements, frames, font tags, body attributes like >vlink and so on and are invalid xhtml? I am shocked (late night browsing >with FF web dev toolbar). Can anyone explain why this is the case. I have >had four pints of San Miguel but surely I'm not that drunk...or naive?
No, just off topic. This thread will stop now. It has not only had no relevance to the reason for this list (the discussion of the practical use of CSS) but it has also seen a fair number of people spout off about their own particular ideological hobby horses. Let this be a lesson to all those who consider posting to css-d when not utterly sober. Crazy CSS experiments fuelled by your intoxication good; Unoriginal hackneyed flamebait rants bad. To reiterate, this thread is dead. Anyone found on the streets of this thread will be unsubscribed on sight. Alex "Twitchy Fingers" Robinson css-d moderator ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
