yes it does seem to make sense however it would be nice to be able to do and not add extra divs
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only >> background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so >> when you repeat-y you can position x but the y is useless (defaults to >> 0). >> ?? > > Isn't that kind of the point? Or did you want to repeat something from a > particular position? In which case you need to get clever with wrappers > and blocks and backgrounds. > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
